Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLCX
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$54.80
Change+$0.38 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Buy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. CSFCX (1.98B). CSFCX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFCX (1.91) vs MGLCX (1.33). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFCX (1.84). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFCX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.68 vs. MGLCX (-5.63). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.24 vs. MGLCX (2.85).
| CSFCX | MGLCX | CSFCX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.587 | 2.795 | 343% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 2.22B | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.68 | -5.63 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.07 | -5.70 | -159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.24 | 2.85 | 746% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.00 | 14.77 | 284% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers