Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLCX
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$53.72
Change-$0.25 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.13
Change-$0.07 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.16B
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLCX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Hold and MGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX (2.16B) and CSFCX (2.06B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CSFCX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFCX (1.86) vs MGLCX (1.30). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFCX (1.84). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). CSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFCX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.61 vs. MGLCX (-4.81). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.02 vs. MGLCX (-4.05).
| CSFCX | MGLCX | CSFCX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.428 | 0.186 | 3,986% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 2.16B | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 1.30 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.61 | -4.81 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.48 | -0.48 | -3,453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.02 | -4.05 | -321% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.75 | 7.63 | 442% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement