Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLCX
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$53.53
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.40
Change-$0.04 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Buy and MGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. CSFCX (1.94B). CSFCX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFCX (1.68) vs MGLCX (1.30). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLCX (10 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFCX (1.84). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFCX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. MGLCX (2.39). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.29 vs. MGLCX (5.81).
| CSFCX | MGLCX | CSFCX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.832 | 2.112 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 2.29B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.30 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 2.39 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.01 | -11.98 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.29 | 5.81 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.69 | 9.12 | 358% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement