Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFCX vs MGLCX
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFCX vs MGLCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty C
Price$53.82
Change+$0.21 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
CSFCX vs MGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFCX vs. MGLCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFCX is a Buy and MGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. CSFCX (2.01B). CSFCX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: CSFCX (1.91) vs MGLCX (1.33). CSFCX was incepted earlier than MGLCX: CSFCX (21 years) vs MGLCX (11 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than CSFCX (1.84). CSFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLCX (48.00). CSFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: CSFCX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). CSFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. MGLCX (-1.56). CSFCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.98 vs. MGLCX (2.60).
| CSFCX | MGLCX | CSFCX / MGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.94 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.95 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.627 | 1.491 | 512% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 2.19B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.33 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.38 | -1.56 | -345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.81 | -10.31 | -37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.98 | 2.60 | 846% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.88 | 8.59 | 371% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers