Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFYX vs FROTX
CSFYX vs FROTX Comparison
Open Charts CSFYX vs FROTX
Columbia Convertible Securities Inst3
Price$24.80
Change-$0.11 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
Franklin Convertible Securities C
Price$23.78
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.9B
CSFYX vs FROTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFYX vs. FROTX commentary
Aug 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFYX is a Hold and FROTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROTX has more cash in the bank: 2.9B vs. CSFYX (1.19B). CSFYX pays higher dividends than FROTX: CSFYX (1.99) vs FROTX (0.63). CSFYX was incepted earlier than FROTX: CSFYX (11 years) vs FROTX (30 years). FROTX (1.59) is less costly to investors than CSFYX (0.81). CSFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. FROTX (37.31). FROTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSFYX: FROTX (1000) vs CSFYX (1000000). CSFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.51 vs. FROTX (11.78). CSFYX return over 5 years is better than : 1.25 vs. FROTX (-10.45).
| CSFYX | FROTX | CSFYX / FROTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.58 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.59 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.145 | 6.675 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 2.9B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 0.63 | 315% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.51 | 11.78 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.03 | 17.73 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.25 | -10.45 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.24 | 46.92 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement