Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs FIRAX
CSFZX vs FIRAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FIRAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.43
Change-$0.35 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate A
Price$10.20
Change-$0.10 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.39M
CSFZX vs FIRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FIRAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and FIRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. FIRAX (336M). FIRAX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: FIRAX (3.07) vs CSFZX (2.80). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FIRAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs FIRAX (19 years). FIRAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). FIRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and FIRAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. CSFZX (2.51). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. FIRAX (-4.29).
| CSFZX | FIRAX | CSFZX / FIRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.17 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.17 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.056 | 19.929 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 336M | 613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.07 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | 5.37 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 22.28 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | -4.29 | -615% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.81 | 16.78 | 303% |