Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs FIRCX
CSFZX vs FIRCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FIRCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.50
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate C
Price$9.76
Change-$0.10 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.89M
CSFZX vs FIRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FIRCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and FIRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. FIRCX (323M). FIRCX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: FIRCX (3.87) vs CSFZX (2.67). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FIRCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs FIRCX (18 years). FIRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). FIRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and FIRCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX (9.97) and FIRCX (9.84) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. FIRCX (-4.91).
| CSFZX | FIRCX | CSFZX / FIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.92 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.92 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.758 | 14.420 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 323M | 617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 3.87 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 9.84 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | -5.85 | -263% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | -4.91 | -626% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.53 | 1.97 | 2,360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement