Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs FIRCX
CSFZX vs FIRCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs FIRCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.12
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate C
Price$9.92
Change-$0.09 (-0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.39M
CSFZX vs FIRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. FIRCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and FIRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. FIRCX (336M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than FIRCX: CSFZX (2.80) vs FIRCX (2.50). CSFZX was incepted earlier than FIRCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs FIRCX (19 years). FIRCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). FIRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and FIRCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FIRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.49 vs. CSFZX (2.08). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.01 vs. FIRCX (-9.15).
| CSFZX | FIRCX | CSFZX / FIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.92 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.92 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.359 | 18.106 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 336M | 620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.50 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | 4.49 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 18.35 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.01 | -9.15 | -284% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.86 | 9.70 | 514% |