Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs IRFAX
CSFZX vs IRFAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRFAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.43
Change-$0.35 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Cohen & Steers International Realty A
Price$9.32
Change-$0.07 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.8M
CSFZX vs IRFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRFAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and IRFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. IRFAX (276M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than IRFAX: CSFZX (2.80) vs IRFAX (2.64). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRFAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs IRFAX (21 years). IRFAX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and IRFAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. IRFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. CSFZX (2.51). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. IRFAX (-0.25).
| CSFZX | IRFAX | CSFZX / IRFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.35 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.48 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.056 | 21.108 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 276M | 746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.64 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | 3.95 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 24.94 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | -0.25 | -10,711% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.81 | 25.85 | 197% |