Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs IRFIX
CSFZX vs IRFIX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRFIX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.50
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Cohen & Steers International Realty I
Price$9.13
Change-$0.06 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.64M
CSFZX vs IRFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRFIX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and IRFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. IRFIX (258M). IRFIX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: IRFIX (2.82) vs CSFZX (2.67). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRFIX: CSFZX (11 years) vs IRFIX (20 years). IRFIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than IRFIX: CSFZX (0) vs IRFIX (100000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. IRFIX (9.44). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.75 vs. IRFIX (3.81).
| CSFZX | IRFIX | CSFZX / IRFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.758 | 16.010 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 258M | 773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 2.82 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 9.44 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.38 | 3.40 | 453% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.75 | 3.81 | 807% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.53 | 22.27 | 209% |