Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs IRFIX
CSFZX vs IRFIX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRFIX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$52.74
Change-$0.21 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Cohen & Steers International Realty I
Price$8.77
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.87M
CSFZX vs IRFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRFIX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and IRFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. IRFIX (251M). IRFIX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: IRFIX (2.92) vs CSFZX (2.74). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRFIX: CSFZX (11 years) vs IRFIX (20 years). IRFIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than IRFIX: CSFZX (0) vs IRFIX (100000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. IRFIX (1.92). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.14 vs. IRFIX (9.24).
| CSFZX | IRFIX | CSFZX / IRFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.22 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.310 | 11.436 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 251M | 774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.92 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 1.92 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.27 | -9.79 | -23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.14 | 9.24 | 424% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.06 | 12.98 | 286% |