Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs JARSX
CSFZX vs JARSX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs JARSX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.12
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
Easterly Global Real Estate R6
Price$14.93
Change-$0.11 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets241.75M
CSFZX vs JARSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. JARSX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and JARSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. JARSX (242M). JARSX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: JARSX (3.06) vs CSFZX (2.80). CSFZX was incepted earlier than JARSX: CSFZX (11 years) vs JARSX (8 years). JARSX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). JARSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and JARSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. JARSX (-2.09). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.01 vs. JARSX (4.10).
| CSFZX | JARSX | CSFZX / JARSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.359 | 6.348 | 163% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 242M | 860% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.06 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | -2.09 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 24.34 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.01 | 4.10 | 634% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.86 | N/A | - |