Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs MGLAX
CSFZX vs MGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs MGLAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$49.72
Change+$0.83 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
MFS Global Real Estate A
Price$14.98
Change+$0.25 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
CSFZX vs MGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. MGLAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and MGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLAX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. CSFZX (1.91B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than MGLAX: CSFZX (2.79) vs MGLAX (2.33). CSFZX was incepted earlier than MGLAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs MGLAX (16 years). MGLAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. MGLAX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLAX: CSFZX (0) vs MGLAX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.75 vs. MGLAX (-6.48). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 22.03 vs. MGLAX (7.25).
| CSFZX | MGLAX | CSFZX / MGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.231 | -7.938 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 2.07B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.75 | -6.48 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.68 | -25.89 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.03 | 7.25 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.15 | 9.92 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...