Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs MGLAX
CSFZX vs MGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs MGLAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.43
Change-$0.35 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
MFS Global Real Estate A
Price$16.60
Change-$0.12 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
CSFZX vs MGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. MGLAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and MGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLAX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. CSFZX (2.06B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than MGLAX: CSFZX (2.80) vs MGLAX (2.22). CSFZX was incepted earlier than MGLAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs MGLAX (17 years). MGLAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLAX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLAX: CSFZX (0) vs MGLAX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.51 vs. MGLAX (-3.50). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.38 vs. MGLAX (6.54).
| CSFZX | MGLAX | CSFZX / MGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.056 | 4.500 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 2.24B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.22 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | -3.50 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.37 | 16.43 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 6.54 | 404% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.81 | 31.24 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement