Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs MGLAX
CSFZX vs MGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs MGLAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$56.01
Change+$0.07 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
MFS Global Real Estate A
Price$16.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
CSFZX vs MGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. MGLAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and MGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLAX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. CSFZX (2.06B). CSFZX pays higher dividends than MGLAX: CSFZX (2.82) vs MGLAX (2.21). CSFZX was incepted earlier than MGLAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs MGLAX (17 years). MGLAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. MGLAX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLAX: CSFZX (0) vs MGLAX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.54 vs. MGLAX (-6.23). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.87 vs. MGLAX (7.69).
| CSFZX | MGLAX | CSFZX / MGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.19 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.374 | 5.500 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 2.25B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 2.21 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | -6.23 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.68 | 3.71 | 530% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.87 | 7.69 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.10 | 38.26 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement