Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURAX
CSFZX vs PURAX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.41
Change+$0.39 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
PGIM Global Real Estate A
Price$20.61
Change+$0.16 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets861.58M
CSFZX vs PURAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. PURAX (862M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURAX: CSFZX (2.93) vs PURAX (2.15). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURAX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURAX (27 years). PURAX (1.38) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURAX: CSFZX (0) vs PURAX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. PURAX (0.35). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.46 vs. PURAX (3.92).
| CSFZX | PURAX | CSFZX / PURAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.38 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.38 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.319 | 7.533 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 862M | 230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.15 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.70 | 0.35 | 490% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.40 | 11.69 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.46 | 3.92 | 700% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.11 | 9.13 | 625% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement