Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.54
Change-$0.69 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$18.69
Change-$0.25 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets879.27M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and PURCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. PURCX (879M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.91) vs PURCX (1.22). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (10 years) vs PURCX (27 years). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). PURCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.62 vs. CSFZX (5.70). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 2.41 vs. PURCX (-17.52).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.960 | 0.592 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.75B | 879M | 200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 1.22 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 6.62 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.40 | -12.72 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.41 | -17.52 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.29 | -12.66 | -263% |