Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.16
Change-$0.23 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$19.36
Change-$0.09 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets846.97M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. PURCX (847M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.93) vs PURCX (1.49). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (27 years). PURCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. PURCX (3.84). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 27.69 vs. PURCX (-0.94).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.831 | 4.916 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 847M | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.49 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.89 | 3.84 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.03 | 3.18 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.69 | -0.94 | -2,954% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.77 | -4.72 | -969% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement