Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$18.36
Change-$0.47 (-2.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets879.49M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and PURCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. PURCX (879M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.79) vs PURCX (1.60). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (27 years). PURCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). PURCX (6.29) and CSFZX (6.24) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. PURCX (21.54).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 1.346 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 879M | 205% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 1.60 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 6.29 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | -14.39 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 21.54 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.69 | -12.42 | -279% |