Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURCX
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.70
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
PGIM Global Real Estate C
Price$19.62
Change-$0.13 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.22M
CSFZX vs PURCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and PURCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. PURCX (887M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURCX: CSFZX (2.84) vs PURCX (1.30). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURCX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURCX (28 years). PURCX (2.17) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than PURCX: CSFZX (0) vs PURCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. PURCX (1.26). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.37 vs. PURCX (-1.63).
| CSFZX | PURCX | CSFZX / PURCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 2.17 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.906 | 7.131 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 887M | 232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.30 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | 1.26 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 19.61 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.37 | -1.63 | -1,191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.09 | -0.85 | -5,658% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement