Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURGX
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.51
Change+$0.24 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
PGIM Global Real Estate R4
Price$20.29
Change+$0.12 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets866.03M
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. PURGX (866M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURGX: CSFZX (2.67) vs PURGX (2.48). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURGX (7 years). PURGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and PURGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PURGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.27 vs. CSFZX (8.40). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 24.38 vs. PURGX (3.54).
| CSFZX | PURGX | CSFZX / PURGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.52 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 4.994 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 866M | 224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 2.48 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 9.27 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.20 | 3.55 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.38 | 3.54 | 690% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement