Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURGX
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.12
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
PGIM Global Real Estate R4
Price$20.74
Change-$0.09 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets886.93M
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. PURGX (887M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURGX: CSFZX (2.80) vs PURGX (2.33). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURGX (8 years). PURGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and PURGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.08 vs. PURGX (1.89). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.01 vs. PURGX (6.53).
| CSFZX | PURGX | CSFZX / PURGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.52 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.359 | 9.157 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 887M | 235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | 1.89 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 37.38 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.01 | 6.53 | 399% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.86 | N/A | - |