Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURGX
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$53.84
Change-$0.14 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
PGIM Global Real Estate R4
Price$20.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets845.38M
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURGX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and PURGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. PURGX (845M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURGX: CSFZX (2.89) vs PURGX (2.45). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURGX (8 years). PURGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and PURGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PURGX (6.93) and CSFZX (6.63) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.52 vs. PURGX (10.83).
| CSFZX | PURGX | CSFZX / PURGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.52 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.193 | 5.462 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 845M | 238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 2.45 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 6.93 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.02 | 14.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | 10.83 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement