Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs PURGX
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs PURGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.70
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
PGIM Global Real Estate R4
Price$20.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.22M
CSFZX vs PURGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. PURGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and PURGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. PURGX (887M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than PURGX: CSFZX (2.84) vs PURGX (2.33). CSFZX was incepted earlier than PURGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs PURGX (8 years). PURGX (1.52) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). PURGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and PURGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX (2.55) and PURGX (2.54) have marching annual gain over last year. CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.37 vs. PURGX (3.65).
| CSFZX | PURGX | CSFZX / PURGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.52 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.906 | 8.391 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 887M | 232% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 2.33 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | 2.54 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 23.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.37 | 3.65 | 530% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement