Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.12
Change-$0.31 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets288.32M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. SWASX (288M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.11) vs CSFZX (2.80). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.23 vs. CSFZX (2.08). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 26.01 vs. SWASX (18.40).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.359 | 9.191 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 288M | 723% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 3.11 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.08 | 2.23 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 30.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.01 | 18.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.86 | 34.87 | 143% |