Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.70
Change-$0.36 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.68
Change-$0.04 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.22M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. SWASX (289M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.17) vs CSFZX (2.84). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. CSFZX (2.55). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 19.37 vs. SWASX (14.45).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.906 | 10.009 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 289M | 712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 3.17 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | 5.66 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.56 | 20.69 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.37 | 14.45 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.09 | 34.73 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers