Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$53.59
Change-$0.50 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.51
Change-$0.07 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.02M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. SWASX (284M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.30) vs CSFZX (2.89). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. CSFZX (4.75). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 34.76 vs. SWASX (22.99).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.696 | 7.145 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 284M | 707% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 3.30 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.75 | 7.11 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.39 | 11.56 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.76 | 22.99 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.49 | 30.42 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers