Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.39
Change+$0.21 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets284.46M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. SWASX (284M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.33) vs CSFZX (2.93). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. CSFZX (6.43). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.23 vs. SWASX (17.74).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.72 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.288 | 7.308 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 284M | 698% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 3.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.43 | 8.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.98 | 5.28 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.23 | 17.74 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.94 | 30.99 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement