Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$54.27
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.85M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and SWASX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. SWASX (281M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.20) vs CSFZX (2.67). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. CSFZX (8.32). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 24.38 vs. SWASX (12.48).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.71 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.71 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 5.472 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 281M | 691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 3.20 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 10.26 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.11 | 1.96 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.38 | 12.48 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.83 | 30.98 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement