Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs SWASX
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs SWASX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.19
Change-$0.12 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.4M
CSFZX vs SWASX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. SWASX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. SWASX (275M). SWASX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: SWASX (3.34) vs CSFZX (2.79). CSFZX was incepted earlier than SWASX: CSFZX (11 years) vs SWASX (18 years). CSFZX (0.84) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.71). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX (0) and SWASX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. CSFZX (6.64). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. SWASX (39.73).
| CSFZX | SWASX | CSFZX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.71 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.71 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 1.607 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 275M | 656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 3.34 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 7.09 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.41 | -12.62 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 39.73 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | 19.22 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...