Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TGREX
CSFZX vs TGREX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TGREX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
TCW Global Real Estate I
Price$12.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.15M
CSFZX vs TGREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TGREX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TGREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. TGREX (41.2M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TGREX: CSFZX (2.80) vs TGREX (2.05). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TGREX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TGREX (11 years). TGREX (1.42) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). TGREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.48 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGREX: CSFZX (0) vs TGREX (2000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.90 vs. TGREX (-1.77). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.33 vs. TGREX (25.15).
| CSFZX | TGREX | CSFZX / TGREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.42 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.155 | 9.540 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 41.2M | 5,053% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.05 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | -1.77 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.05 | 31.98 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.33 | 25.15 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.56 | 58.28 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement