Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs TGREX
CSFZX vs TGREX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TGREX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
TCW Global Real Estate I
Price$11.60
Change-$0.31 (-2.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.21M
CSFZX vs TGREX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TGREX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TGREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. TGREX (42.2M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TGREX: CSFZX (2.79) vs TGREX (2.00). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TGREX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TGREX (10 years). TGREX (1.34) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). TGREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.48 vs. CSFZX (52.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGREX: CSFZX (0) vs TGREX (2000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. TGREX (5.06). TGREX return over 5 years is better than : 60.39 vs. CSFZX (52.66).
| CSFZX | TGREX | CSFZX / TGREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.34 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 3.110 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 42.2M | 4,275% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.00 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 5.06 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.41 | -5.74 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 60.39 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | 41.00 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...