Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TGRYX
CSFZX vs TGRYX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TGRYX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.52
Change+$0.80 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
TCW Global Real Estate N
Price$12.76
Change+$0.27 (+2.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.48M
CSFZX vs TGRYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TGRYX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Buy and TGRYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. TGRYX (42.5M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TGRYX: CSFZX (2.93) vs TGRYX (1.83). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TGRYX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TGRYX (11 years). TGRYX (1.85) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). TGRYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.48 vs. CSFZX (67.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGRYX: CSFZX (0) vs TGRYX (2000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.32 vs. TGRYX (2.98). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.37 vs. TGRYX (27.59).
| CSFZX | TGRYX | CSFZX / TGRYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.85 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.538 | 10.939 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 42.5M | 4,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.83 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 2.98 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.79 | 14.92 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.37 | 27.59 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.92 | 70.30 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement