Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$56.74
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.99
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.38M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TIRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. TIRGX (67.4M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.80) vs TIRGX (2.44). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.01 vs. TIRGX (1.00). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 32.08 vs. TIRGX (15.57).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.967 | 7.995 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 67.4M | 3,089% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.44 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.01 | 1.00 | 399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.04 | 23.72 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.08 | 15.57 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement