Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$52.74
Change-$0.21 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$16.83
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.45M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TIRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. TIRGX (65.4M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.74) vs TIRGX (2.21). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (8 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.34 vs. TIRGX (3.82). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.14 vs. TIRGX (18.77).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.310 | -0.068 | -4,855% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 65.4M | 2,971% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 2.21 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 3.82 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.27 | -4.09 | -55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.14 | 18.77 | 209% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.06 | N/A | - |