Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$55.68
Change+$0.56 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$17.66
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.99M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TIRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. TIRGX (66M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.80) vs TIRGX (2.44). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (9 years). TIRGX (1.21) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.47 vs. TIRGX (-2.67). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 28.67 vs. TIRGX (14.56).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.21 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.742 | 5.834 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 66M | 3,155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.80 | 2.44 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.47 | -2.67 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.62 | 23.04 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.67 | 14.56 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement