Ad is loading...
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty Z
Price$51.31
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
T. Rowe Price Global Real Estate I
Price$16.64
Change-$0.43 (-2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.06M
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a StrongBuy and TIRGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. TIRGX (67.1M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (2.79) vs TIRGX (2.58). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (11 years) vs TIRGX (8 years). TIRGX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. TIRGX (31.90). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. TIRGX (4.99). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. TIRGX (32.50).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.74 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.18 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.468 | 0.997 | 248% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 67.1M | 2,689% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.79 | 2.58 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 4.99 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.61 | -16.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.66 | 32.50 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.69 | N/A | - |