Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs TIRGX
CSFZX vs TIRGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. TIRGX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and TIRGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.3B vs. TIRGX (62.6M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than TIRGX: CSFZX (3.27) vs TIRGX (2.54). CSFZX was incepted earlier than TIRGX: CSFZX (12 years) vs TIRGX (10 years). TIRGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). CSFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. TIRGX (48.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than TIRGX: CSFZX (0) vs TIRGX (500000). TIRGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. CSFZX (4.82). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 3.65 vs. TIRGX (-9.98).
| CSFZX | TIRGX | CSFZX / TIRGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.73 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.30 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.373 | 4.829 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.3B | 62.6M | 3,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 2.54 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.82 | 5.37 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 27.49 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.65 | -9.98 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement