Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGCX vs RLBCX
CSGCX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSGCX vs RLBCX
Calvert Balanced C
Price$43.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.37B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$35.92
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.02B
CSGCX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGCX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGCX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 248B vs. CSGCX (1.38B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: RLBCX (1.63) vs CSGCX (0.67). CSGCX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CSGCX (31 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CSGCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: RLBCX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.05 vs. CSGCX (3.88). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.81 vs. CSGCX (35.66).
| CSGCX | RLBCX | CSGCX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.89 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 0.89 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.606 | 5.796 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.38B | 248B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.63 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.88 | 6.05 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.94 | 30.55 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | 39.81 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.19 | 57.74 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement