CSGQF
Price
$1.38
Change
+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Updated
Feb 25 closing price
Capitalization
449.1M
KYWAF
Price
$10.21
Change
-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Updated
Mar 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSGQF vs KYWAF

Header iconCSGQF vs KYWAF Comparison
Open Charts CSGQF vs KYWAFBanner chart's image
Costain Group
Price$1.38
Change+$0.03 (+2.22%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization449.1M
Exeo Group
Price$10.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Volume$620
Capitalization2.66B
CSGQF vs KYWAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSGQF vs. KYWAF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGQF is a Buy and KYWAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CSGQF: $1.38 vs. KYWAF: $10.22)
Brand notoriety: CSGQF and KYWAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSGQF: 100% vs. KYWAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSGQF: $449.1M vs. KYWAF: $2.66B
CSGQF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $449.1M. KYWAF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $2.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSGQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKYWAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSGQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KYWAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSGQF is a better buy in the long-term than KYWAF.

Price Growth

CSGQF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KYWAF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+2.32% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KYWAF($2.66B) has a higher market cap than CSGQF($449M). KYWAF has higher P/E ratio than CSGQF: KYWAF (16.93) vs CSGQF (9.23). CSGQF YTD gains are higher at: 1.852 vs. KYWAF (0.000). KYWAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 50.4B vs. CSGQF (57.4M). KYWAF has more cash in the bank: 38.7B vs. CSGQF (166M). CSGQF has less debt than KYWAF: CSGQF (22.7M) vs KYWAF (93.1B). KYWAF has higher revenues than CSGQF: KYWAF (622B) vs CSGQF (1.31B).
CSGQFKYWAFCSGQF / KYWAF
Capitalization449M2.66B17%
EBITDA57.4M50.4B0%
Gain YTD1.8520.000-
P/E Ratio9.2316.9355%
Revenue1.31B622B0%
Total Cash166M38.7B0%
Total Debt22.7M93.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KYWAF: Fundamental Ratings
KYWAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSCLX17.180.02
+0.12%
DFA International Social Cor Eq Instl
MKVGX15.82N/A
N/A
MFS International Large Cap Value R4
MIDSX2.16N/A
N/A
Midas Discovery
GICPX60.83N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Growth AAA
DRDCX25.49N/A
N/A
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C

CSGQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSGQF and FIX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSGQF and FIX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSGQF
1D Price
Change %
CSGQF100%
N/A
FIX - CSGQF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
AGFY - CSGQF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
DNERF - CSGQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KYWAF - CSGQF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CADLF - CSGQF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KYWAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KYWAF and AGFY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KYWAF and AGFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KYWAF
1D Price
Change %
KYWAF100%
N/A
AGFY - KYWAF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
VATE - KYWAF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
BWMN - KYWAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
CSGQF - KYWAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRGGF - KYWAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More