Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGZX vs SLMCX
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CSGZX vs SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst
Price$88.18
Change+$1.12 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$147.93
Change+$1.93 (+1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.04B
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGZX vs. SLMCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGZX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. CSGZX (2.77B). CSGZX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGZX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CSGZX (15 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). SLMCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CSGZX (1.04). CSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). CSGZX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.12 vs. CSGZX (17.09). CSGZX return over 5 years is better than : 69.21 vs. SLMCX (61.29).
| CSGZX | SLMCX | CSGZX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.18 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.18 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.455 | 17.354 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 16B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.09 | 18.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.27 | 55.87 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.21 | 61.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 194.66 | 156.95 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement