Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSGZX vs SLMCX
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CSGZX vs SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst
Price$100.63
Change-$0.49 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.13B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$167.32
Change-$0.81 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.4B
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGZX vs. SLMCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGZX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 18.4B vs. CSGZX (3.13B). CSGZX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGZX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CSGZX (15 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CSGZX (1.04). CSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). CSGZX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.67 vs. CSGZX (24.98). CSGZX return over 5 years is better than : 83.98 vs. SLMCX (76.83).
| CSGZX | SLMCX | CSGZX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.16 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.16 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.545 | 35.142 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 18.4B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.98 | 26.67 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.38 | 98.71 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.98 | 76.83 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 230.72 | 190.08 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement