Ad is loading...
CSGZX vs SLMCX
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts CSGZX vs SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst
Price$64.77
Change+$7.37 (+12.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$105.82
Change+$11.92 (+12.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.52B
CSGZX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSGZX vs. SLMCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSGZX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. CSGZX (1.87B). CSGZX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . CSGZX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: CSGZX (15 years) vs SLMCX (42 years). SLMCX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CSGZX (1.04). CSGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. SLMCX (39.00). CSGZX (2000) and SLMCX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSGZX (-22.53) and SLMCX (-22.98) have marching annual gain over last year. CSGZX return over 5 years is better than : 45.96 vs. SLMCX (36.82).
| CSGZX | SLMCX | CSGZX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.18 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.18 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -24.194 | -24.524 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 10.5B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.53 | -22.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.36 | -14.54 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.96 | 36.82 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.06 | 58.48 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...