Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs RMLPX
CSHCX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. RMLPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. CSHCX (1.09B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHCX (8.59) vs RMLPX (5.20). CSHCX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHCX (2.24) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). CSHCX (2500) and RMLPX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. RMLPX (9.61). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 237.15 vs. CSHCX (173.58).
| CSHCX | RMLPX | CSHCX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 1.10 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | 5.369 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.17B | 93% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.59 | 5.20 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 9.61 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.56 | 79.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.58 | 237.15 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement