Ad is loading...
CSHCX vs SMFPX
CSHCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. CSHCX (1.18B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHCX (9.93) vs SMFPX (4.75). CSHCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHCX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHCX (20.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.28 vs. SMFPX (50.95). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 99.93 vs. CSHCX (83.13).
| CSHCX | SMFPX | CSHCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.916 | 8.949 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.35B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.93 | 4.75 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 54.28 | 50.95 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.25 | 93.18 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.13 | 99.93 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.83 | 37.55 | 50% |