Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs SMFPX
CSHCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. CSHCX (1.09B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHCX (8.59) vs SMFPX (3.39). CSHCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). CSHCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHCX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. SMFPX (15.70). CSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 173.58 vs. SMFPX (150.52).
| CSHCX | SMFPX | CSHCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.12 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.809 | 2.104 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.26B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.59 | 3.39 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 15.70 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.56 | 74.70 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.58 | 150.52 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.12 | 31.11 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement