Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHCX vs SMFPX
CSHCX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHCX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHCX is a Buy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. CSHCX (1.09B). CSHCX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHCX (8.66) vs SMFPX (3.40). CSHCX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHCX (15 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). CSHCX (2.24) and SMFPX (2.15) have similar cost to investors . SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. CSHCX (25.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHCX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHCX (2500). CSHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.53 vs. SMFPX (16.30). CSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 166.28 vs. SMFPX (139.58).
| CSHCX | SMFPX | CSHCX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.12 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 2.15 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.661 | 2.302 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 1.28B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.66 | 3.40 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.53 | 16.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.54 | 58.00 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 166.28 | 139.58 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.86 | 47.89 | 46% |