Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and GLPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. CSHNX (1.08B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPAX (7.27) vs CSHNX (6.67). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (13 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. GLPAX (6.05). CSHNX (236.62) and GLPAX (230.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.400 | 1.385 | 245% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 1.6B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 7.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 6.05 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.57 | 64.06 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 236.62 | 230.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.80 | 53.73 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement