Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.65B vs. CSHNX (1.1B). GLPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPAX (6.93) vs CSHNX (6.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (12 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.79 vs. GLPAX (10.02). GLPAX return over 5 years is better than : 201.27 vs. CSHNX (188.18).
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.970 | 3.259 | 60% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 1.65B | 67% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 6.93 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.79 | 10.02 | 188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.08 | 84.09 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 188.18 | 201.27 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.55 | 33.44 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement