Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and GLPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: GLPAX (7.14) vs CSHNX (6.64). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (12 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. GLPAX (7.89). GLPAX (218.75) and CSHNX (211.67) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.470 | 2.408 | 144% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 1.62B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 7.14 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.45 | 7.89 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.83 | 59.63 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 211.67 | 218.75 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.66 | 62.12 | 75% |