Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a StrongBuy and GLPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. CSHNX (1.12B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than GLPAX: CSHNX (7.86) vs GLPAX (6.61). CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (12 years). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.55 vs. GLPAX (33.72). GLPAX (100.87) and CSHNX (96.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.217 | 7.095 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 1.76B | 64% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 6.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.55 | 33.72 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.05 | 89.13 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.51 | 100.87 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.38 | 30.88 | 89% |