Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and GLPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. CSHNX (1.06B). GLPAX (7.09) and CSHNX (6.94) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (12 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.49 vs. GLPAX (11.95). GLPAX (182.43) and CSHNX (180.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.306 | 0.493 | -265% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 1.62B | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.94 | 7.09 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.49 | 11.95 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.86 | 66.03 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.80 | 182.43 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.01 | 19.85 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...