Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs GLPAX
CSHNX vs GLPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. GLPAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and GLPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLPAX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. CSHNX (1.04B). GLPAX (7.38) and CSHNX (7.05) have matching dividends . CSHNX was incepted earlier than GLPAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs GLPAX (13 years). GLPAX (6.99) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). GLPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). GLPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). GLPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: GLPAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). GLPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.72 vs. CSHNX (-1.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.35 vs. GLPAX (184.18).
| CSHNX | GLPAX | CSHNX / GLPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 6.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | 2.787 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.59B | 66% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 7.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | 1.72 | -106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 51.43 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 184.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 80.26 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement