Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPCX
CSHNX vs PRPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPCX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. PRPCX (486M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPCX (63.74) vs CSHNX (6.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPCX (11 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.48). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPCX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.22 vs. PRPCX (15.21). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 230.39 vs. PRPCX (181.48).
| CSHNX | PRPCX | CSHNX / PRPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.20 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.20 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.172 | -3.532 | 118% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 486M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 63.74 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.22 | 15.21 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.20 | 33.26 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 230.39 | 181.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.52 | 15.40 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...