Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPCX
CSHNX vs PRPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. PRPCX (478M). PRPCX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPCX (65.50) vs CSHNX (7.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPCX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPCX (12 years). PRPCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). PRPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPCX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.32 vs. CSHNX (-0.65). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 193.62 vs. PRPCX (141.14).
| CSHNX | PRPCX | CSHNX / PRPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 2.20 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | 4.513 | 48% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 478M | 218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 65.50 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -0.32 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 46.43 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 141.14 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | 86.42 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers