Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPQX
CSHNX vs PRPQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPQX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. PRPQX (502M). PRPQX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPQX (49.03) vs CSHNX (6.61). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPQX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPQX (8 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPQX (1.10). PRPQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPQX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPQX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.82 vs. PRPQX (15.70). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.90 vs. PRPQX (153.28).
| CSHNX | PRPQX | CSHNX / PRPQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.10 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 4.266 | 47% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 502M | 216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 49.03 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 15.70 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 50.13 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 153.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement