Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. PRPZX (532M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than PRPZX: CSHNX (7.86) vs PRPZX (5.53). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (11 years). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.11 vs. PRPZX (30.84). CSHNX (91.96) and PRPZX (91.23) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.867 | 4.857 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 532M | 212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 5.53 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.11 | 30.84 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.65 | 69.89 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 91.96 | 91.23 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.86 | 39.93 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers