Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. PRPZX (504M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (49.29) vs CSHNX (6.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.97 vs. PRPZX (16.63). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 187.86 vs. PRPZX (168.35).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.518 | 3.310 | 46% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 504M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 49.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.97 | 16.63 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.26 | 58.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 187.86 | 168.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.54 | 50.65 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement