Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. PRPZX (493M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (49.71) vs CSHNX (6.39). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (11 years). CSHNX (1.48) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.84 vs. PRPZX (18.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 221.57 vs. PRPZX (186.23).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.18 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.413 | -1.625 | 87% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 493M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 49.71 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.84 | 18.82 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.85 | 40.66 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 221.57 | 186.23 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.68 | 31.17 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...