Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. PRPZX (576M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than PRPZX: CSHNX (7.86) vs PRPZX (5.53). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (10 years) vs PRPZX (11 years). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 90.20 vs. CSHNX (41.62). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 160.63 vs. CSHNX (74.95).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.286 | 89.673 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 576M | 180% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 5.53 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.62 | 90.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.71 | 152.22 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.95 | 160.63 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.61 | 99.07 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...