Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jun 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. PRPZX (519M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (51.02) vs CSHNX (6.79). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (11 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX (24.59) and PRPZX (23.60) have marching annual gain over last year. PRPZX (140.77) and CSHNX (139.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.143 | 4.953 | 23% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 519M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 51.02 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.59 | 23.60 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.32 | 48.61 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 139.80 | 140.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.54 | 40.95 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement