Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. PRPZX (509M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (48.64) vs CSHNX (6.67). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPZX (12.21) and CSHNX (12.09) have marching annual gain over last year. CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 224.13 vs. PRPZX (181.17).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.584 | 6.732 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 509M | 211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.67 | 48.64 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 12.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.89 | 62.14 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 224.13 | 181.17 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.05 | 79.75 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement