Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. PRPZX (512M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (49.29) vs CSHNX (6.61). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). PRPZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.96 vs. CSHNX (16.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 171.90 vs. PRPZX (157.40).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.990 | 6.399 | 31% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 512M | 213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 49.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.82 | 17.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 52.78 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 171.90 | 157.40 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.16 | 63.20 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement