Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. PRPZX (558M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than PRPZX: CSHNX (7.86) vs PRPZX (5.53). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (11 years). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. PRPZX (46.07). PRPZX return over 5 years is better than : 93.10 vs. CSHNX (85.63).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 9.920 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 558M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 5.53 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 46.07 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 72.36 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 93.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | 54.50 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...