Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and PRPZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. PRPZX (521M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (49.29) vs CSHNX (6.57). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (12 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.91 vs. PRPZX (19.05). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 188.69 vs. PRPZX (176.89).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.151 | 6.102 | 35% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 521M | 212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.57 | 49.29 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.91 | 19.05 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.47 | 71.37 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 188.69 | 176.89 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.18 | 46.49 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement