Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs PRPZX
CSHNX vs PRPZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. PRPZX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and PRPZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. PRPZX (503M). PRPZX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: PRPZX (52.96) vs CSHNX (6.94). CSHNX was incepted earlier than PRPZX: CSHNX (11 years) vs PRPZX (11 years). CSHNX (1.49) is less costly to investors than PRPZX (1.18). PRPZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). PRPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: PRPZX (0) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.50 vs. PRPZX (18.19). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 180.80 vs. PRPZX (162.92).
| CSHNX | PRPZX | CSHNX / PRPZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.18 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.306 | 0.481 | -271% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 503M | 209% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.94 | 52.96 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.50 | 18.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.22 | 52.64 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.80 | 162.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.06 | 33.97 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...