Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs SMRPX
CSHNX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. CSHNX (1.17B). CSHNX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: CSHNX (7.86) vs SMRPX (5.72). CSHNX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: CSHNX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHNX (20.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: CSHNX (2500) vs SMRPX (1000000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. SMRPX (53.74). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 102.85 vs. CSHNX (85.63).
| CSHNX | SMRPX | CSHNX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 9.153 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 1.33B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 5.72 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 53.74 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 91.15 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 102.85 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | N/A | - |