CSHX
Price
$68.06
Change
-$1.37 (-1.97%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
171.09M
GPFOF
Price
$2.55
Change
-$0.15 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs GPFOF

Header iconCSHX vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$68.06
Change-$1.37 (-1.97%)
Volume$196
Capitalization171.09M
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.55
Change-$0.15 (-5.56%)
Volume$220
Capitalization14.96B
CSHX vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. GPFOF commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and GPFOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $68.06 vs. GPFOF: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 7% vs. GPFOF: 11%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $171.09M vs. GPFOF: $14.96B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $171.09M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than GPFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSHX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($171M). GPFOF has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: GPFOF (9.60) vs CSHX (6.06). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 19.667 vs. GPFOF (8.511). CSHX has less debt than GPFOF: CSHX (14.2M) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than CSHX: GPFOF (62.4B) vs CSHX (77.2M).
CSHXGPFOFCSHX / GPFOF
Capitalization171M15B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.6678.511231%
P/E Ratio6.069.6063%
Revenue77.2M62.4B0%
Total Cash24MN/A-
Total Debt14.2M68.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3732
SMR RATING
1..100
362
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3066
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (58). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (37). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (36). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (51). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (66). This means that CSHX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRGIX9.99-0.01
-0.10%
VY® CBRE Global Real Estate I
IGSLX12.18-0.07
-0.57%
Impax Global Social Leaders Investor
CEMDX14.02-0.10
-0.71%
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
AZNCX9.68-0.09
-0.92%
Virtus Income & Growth C
MNHWX26.47-0.31
-1.16%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term W

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSHX has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSHX jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
-0.61%
GPFOF - CSHX
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
BHLB - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More