CSHX
Price
$66.92
Change
-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
171.09M
GPFOF
Price
$2.46
Change
+$0.06 (+2.50%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
Ad is loading...

CSHX vs GPFOF

Header iconCSHX vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$66.92
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
Volume$3.66K
Capitalization171.09M
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.46
Change+$0.06 (+2.50%)
Volume$16.1K
Capitalization14.96B
CSHX vs GPFOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. GPFOF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and GPFOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $66.92 vs. GPFOF: $2.46)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 255% vs. GPFOF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $171.09M vs. GPFOF: $14.96B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $171.09M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.65% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($171M). GPFOF has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: GPFOF (9.60) vs CSHX (6.06). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 16.052 vs. GPFOF (4.553). CSHX has less debt than GPFOF: CSHX (14.2M) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than CSHX: GPFOF (62.4B) vs CSHX (77.2M).
CSHXGPFOFCSHX / GPFOF
Capitalization171M15B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.0524.553353%
P/E Ratio6.069.6063%
Revenue77.2M62.4B0%
Total Cash24MN/A-
Total Debt14.2M68.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5837
SMR RATING
1..100
372
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (74). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (58). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (37). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (44). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (49). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADN4.96-0.14
-2.75%
Advent Technologies Holdings Inc.
WSO498.68-16.53
-3.21%
Watsco
SMTC37.10-1.61
-4.16%
Semtech Corp
NBR43.23-2.84
-6.16%
Nabors Industries Ltd
MAMA6.29-0.63
-9.10%
Mama's Creations

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSHX has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSHX jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
-0.10%
GPFOF - CSHX
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
BHLB - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More