CSHX
Price
$69.00
Change
+$0.35 (+0.51%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
269.15M
GPFOF
Price
$2.57
Change
-$0.01 (-0.39%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
15.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs GPFOF

Header iconCSHX vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$69.00
Change+$0.35 (+0.51%)
Volume$444
Capitalization269.15M
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.57
Change-$0.01 (-0.39%)
Volume$7.8K
Capitalization15.59B
CSHX vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. GPFOF commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Buy and GPFOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $69.00 vs. GPFOF: $2.57)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 18% vs. GPFOF: 482%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $269.15M vs. GPFOF: $15.59B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $269.15M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.23B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than GPFOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15.6B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($269M). CSHX has higher P/E ratio than GPFOF: CSHX (9.32) vs GPFOF (7.69). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 21.320 vs. GPFOF (9.562). CSHX has less debt than GPFOF: CSHX (84M) vs GPFOF (51.5B). GPFOF has higher revenues than CSHX: GPFOF (85.7B) vs CSHX (81M).
CSHXGPFOFCSHX / GPFOF
Capitalization269M15.6B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.3209.562223%
P/E Ratio9.327.69121%
Revenue81M85.7B0%
Total Cash33.9MN/A-
Total Debt84M51.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2488
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4134
SMR RATING
1..100
422
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2672
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (44). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CSHX (41). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSHX (42). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (56). This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (72). This means that CSHX’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCRTX58.502.10
+3.72%
Morgan Stanley Insight R6
GMXAX16.600.44
+2.72%
Nationwide Mid Cap Market Idx A
RYRTX55.861.10
+2.01%
Rydex Retailing A
BROKX22.740.35
+1.56%
BlackRock Advantage International K
RYSPX97.791.46
+1.52%
Rydex S&P 500 H

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSHX has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSHX jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
+0.51%
GPFOF - CSHX
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
+4.98%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.02%
BHLB - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.80%
BRKL - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.08%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More