CSHX
Price
$66.50
Change
-$0.94 (-1.39%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
259.8M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NIC
Price
$119.90
Change
-$0.85 (-0.70%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.79B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSHX vs NIC

Header iconCSHX vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts CSHX vs NICBanner chart's image
Cashmere Valley Bank
Price$66.50
Change-$0.94 (-1.39%)
Volume$500
Capitalization259.8M
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$119.90
Change-$0.85 (-0.70%)
Volume$600
Capitalization1.79B
CSHX vs NIC Comparison Chart in %
CSHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSHX vs. NIC commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHX is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CSHX: $66.50 vs. NIC: $120.75)
Brand notoriety: CSHX and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSHX: 14% vs. NIC: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSHX: $259.8M vs. NIC: $1.79B
CSHX [@Regional Banks] is valued at $259.8M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSHX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSHX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSHX is a better buy in the long-term than NIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSHX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSHX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the short-term than CSHX.

Price Growth

CSHX (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

NIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.14% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($1.79B) has a higher market cap than CSHX($260M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than CSHX: NIC (12.91) vs CSHX (8.99). CSHX YTD gains are higher at: 16.924 vs. NIC (15.947). NIC has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. CSHX (33.9M). CSHX has less debt than NIC: CSHX (84M) vs NIC (135M). NIC has higher revenues than CSHX: NIC (379M) vs CSHX (81M).
CSHXNICCSHX / NIC
Capitalization260M1.79B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.92415.947106%
P/E Ratio8.9912.9170%
Revenue81M379M21%
Total Cash33.9M130M26%
Total Debt84M135M62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSHX vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
CSHX
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4733
SMR RATING
1..100
4221
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2748
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSHX's Valuation (43) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (47) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CSHX (42) in the null industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to CSHX’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

CSHX's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as NIC (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CSHX’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSHXNIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
39%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSHX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJSAX11.890.03
+0.25%
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity A
FCSGX15.52N/A
N/A
Franklin Small Cap Growth C
SPFFX31.45N/A
N/A
Sphere 500 Climate R6
STFAX498.23-4.11
-0.82%
State Street Equity 500 Index Adm
ESGNX22.03-0.19
-0.86%
Mirova Global Megatrends N

CSHX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSHX has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSHX jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSHX
1D Price
Change %
CSHX100%
-1.39%
GPFOF - CSHX
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NIC - CSHX
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
RNST - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
MYFW - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
HBNC - CSHX
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More