Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHZX vs RMLPX
CSHZX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. RMLPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. CSHZX (1.04B). CSHZX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: CSHZX (6.52) vs RMLPX (5.21). CSHZX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: CSHZX (15 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). CSHZX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). CSHZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMLPX (15.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: RMLPX (2500) vs CSHZX (1000000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. CSHZX (-0.45). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 232.54 vs. CSHZX (196.85).
| CSHZX | RMLPX | CSHZX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.10 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.340 | 9.757 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.18B | 89% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.52 | 5.21 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 2.31 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.09 | 56.60 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 196.85 | 232.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement