Ad is loading...
CSHZX vs SMFPX
CSHZX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHZX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHZX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.35B vs. CSHZX (1.18B). CSHZX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHZX (7.35) vs SMFPX (4.75). CSHZX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHZX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHZX (20.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHZX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHZX (1000000). CSHZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.69 vs. SMFPX (50.95). SMFPX (99.93) and CSHZX (97.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHZX | SMFPX | CSHZX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.965 | 8.949 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 1.35B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.35 | 4.75 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.69 | 50.95 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.29 | 93.18 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.02 | 99.93 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.86 | 37.55 | 77% |