Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSIFX vs RLBCX
CSIFX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSIFX vs RLBCX
Calvert Balanced A
Price$47.30
Change+$0.30 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.30
Change+$0.11 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.45B
CSIFX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSIFX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIFX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. CSIFX (1.43B). RLBCX pays higher dividends than CSIFX: RLBCX (1.53) vs CSIFX (1.29). CSIFX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CSIFX (43 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CSIFX (0.90) and RLBCX (0.89) have similar cost to investors . CSIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSIFX: RLBCX (250) vs CSIFX (1000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. CSIFX (6.78). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.33 vs. CSIFX (34.41).
| CSIFX | RLBCX | CSIFX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.89 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.89 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 9.861 | 66% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.53 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 8.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.83 | 36.23 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.41 | 36.33 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.40 | 72.59 | 93% |