It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSIQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSIQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSIQ (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -11.33% price change this week, while IPWR (@Semiconductors) price change was -19.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -7.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -7.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.44%.
CSIQ is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.
IPWR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.
The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
@Semiconductors (-7.10% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| CSIQ | IPWR | CSIQ / IPWR | |
| Capitalization | 1.77B | 31.7M | 5,584% |
| EBITDA | -27.4M | -11.18M | 245% |
| Gain YTD | 137.635 | -50.728 | -271% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.09 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.92B | 19.2K | 30,828,125% |
| Total Cash | 1.86B | 11.1M | 16,721% |
| Total Debt | 7.13B | 446K | 1,597,534% |
CSIQ | IPWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IPWR's Valuation (73) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (89). This means that IPWR’s stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
IPWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (100). This means that IPWR’s stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's SMR Rating (87) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as IPWR (96). This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to IPWR’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPWR (91). This means that CSIQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPWR’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for IPWR (100). This means that CSIQ’s stock grew significantly faster than IPWR’s over the last 12 months.
| CSIQ | IPWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 14 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIQ | 100% | -7.17% | ||
| JKS - CSIQ | 66% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| ENPH - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| FCEL - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| BE - CSIQ | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| ARRY - CSIQ | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.82% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that IPWR and SOL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IPWR and SOL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IPWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPWR | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| SOL - IPWR | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| CSIQ - IPWR | 32% Poorly correlated | -7.17% | ||
| SLDP - IPWR | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.36% | ||
| KE - IPWR | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| MRVL - IPWR | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.72% | ||
More | ||||