Advertisement
CSIQ vs JKS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) vs. JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CSIQ and JKS operate in the solar energy sector, facing industry oversupply and margin pressures, but CSIQ shows stronger recent momentum with over 50% gains in the past month.
- JKS boasts larger scale with 130 GW module capacity and higher revenue (TTM $63.9B vs. CSIQ's $5.6B), but struggles with negative EBITDA (-$5.29B).
- CSIQ benefits from U.S. manufacturing expansion and battery storage deals, aiding diversification amid trade tensions.
- YTD, JKS outperforms with positive returns (around 1-8%) versus CSIQ's declines (-15% to -29%), reflecting relative stability.
- Both stocks trade at low valuations (P/S ratios 0.21x-0.23x for CSIQ, lower for JKS), with analyst targets suggesting upside potential.
- Volatility differs: CSIQ beta 1.44 vs. JKS 0.49, indicating higher risk for CSIQ.
Introduction
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) are leading players in the photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturing space, both grappling with global solar oversupply, rising costs, and trade barriers. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent market performance, and positioning within the renewable energy sector. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term solar growth amid energy transition trends will find value in understanding their relative strengths, risks, and sentiment drivers in the current environment.
CSIQ Overview and Recent Performance
Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) designs, manufactures, and sells solar modules, battery storage solutions, and provides engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) services through its Manufacturing and Recurrent Energy segments. The company operates globally, with a focus on expanding U.S. production to mitigate tariffs. In recent market activity, CSIQ shares have exhibited high volatility, surging over 50% in the past month amid sector rotation but posting YTD declines of 15-29%. Influences include Q1 revenue of $1.08B, battery storage contracts in the U.S. and U.K., and cost pressures from weak module shipments. Sentiment has shifted with analyst targets around $17-20, reflecting cautious optimism on storage growth offsetting solar headwinds.
JKS Overview and Recent Performance
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) is a vertically integrated PV leader, producing solar modules, wafers, cells, and ingots, with system integration and EPC services. It holds top global shipment rankings, with 130 GW module capacity as of late 2025. Recent weeks saw JKS gain modestly (around 5-8% monthly), maintaining slight YTD positives (1-8%) versus broader solar weakness. Key drivers include a 2 GW UAE supply deal, U.S. subsidiary sale for $191.5M, and Q1 record shipments despite revenue drops and losses. Lower beta (0.49) supports steadier performance, though thin margins (gross ~2-4%) and high debt weigh on sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current market conditions—based on AI analysis of performance in key industries—earn a spot among the 25 featured trending robots. These bots employ diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, technical patterns, and fundamental scans, with customizable timeframes (e.g., 5min to 60min) and volatility filters (low to high). Highlighted stats include win rates of 70-95%, profit factors up to 12.5, and annualized returns reaching 227-313% in sectors like energy, semis, and oil. Traders can explore AI Signal Agents for real-time alerts or Virtual/Brokerage Agents with risk management. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to discover bots aligned with today's opportunities.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CSIQ and JKS focus on PV modules amid solar oversupply, but differ in scale and diversification. JKS's massive revenue ($63.9B TTM) and shipment volume contrast CSIQ's smaller $5.6B, yet CSIQ edges in gross margins (~18% vs. ~4%) and positive EBITDA via storage focus. Growth drivers: CSIQ leverages U.S. factories and Recurrent Energy projects; JKS excels in global volume but faces tariff risks. Recent momentum favors volatile CSIQ (54% 1M gain), while JKS offers stability (lower beta). Risks include debt for both, but CSIQ's 35% short interest signals bearish bets versus JKS's 4.5%. Sector exposure ties to renewables policy; sentiment leans toward CSIQ for storage upside, JKS for scale trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors CSIQ due to superior margin resilience, U.S.-centric catalysts like storage backlogs, and stronger short-term trend consistency amid solar recovery signals. While JKS provides scale and relative YTD stability, CSIQ's positioning offers higher probabilistic upside in a diversifying energy storage landscape.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIQ is a Buy and JKS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSIQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJKS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CSIQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- JKS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSIQ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JKS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSIQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- JKS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CSIQ (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -21.97% price change this week, while JKS (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -21.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -6.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSIQ is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
JKS is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-6.40% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
| CSIQ | JKS | CSIQ / JKS | |
| Capitalization | 1.03B | 914M | 113% |
| EBITDA | 154M | -6.28B | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -35.886 | -32.352 | 111% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.09 | 27.18 | 74% |
| Revenue | 5.48B | 63.9B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 1.44B | 22.8B | 6% |
| Total Debt | 7.81B | 53.1B | 15% |
CSIQ | JKS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
JKS's Valuation (3) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (35). This means that JKS’s stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
JKS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (100). This means that JKS’s stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's SMR Rating (94) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as JKS (97). This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to JKS’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as JKS (65). This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to JKS’s over the last 12 months.
JKS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CSIQ (4). This means that JKS’s stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
| CSIQ | JKS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TRWFX | 27.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Transamerica International Equity R4 | |||
| SLGFX | 23.63 | N/A | N/A |
| SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT) | |||
| BUIBX | 22.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Buffalo Flexible Allocation Inst | |||
| RMFAX | 61.37 | -0.54 | -0.87% |
| American Funds American Mutual R1 | |||
| MCYVX | 16.34 | -0.44 | -2.62% |
| NYLI Candriam Emerging Markets Eq Inv Cl | |||
CSIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIQ | 100% | -5.46% | ||
| JKS - CSIQ | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.38% | ||
| FCEL - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| BE - CSIQ | 50% Loosely correlated | -9.78% | ||
| PLUG - CSIQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| SLDP - CSIQ | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
JKS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JKS has been loosely correlated with CSIQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JKS jumps, then CSIQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JKS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JKS | 100% | -4.38% | ||
| CSIQ - JKS | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.46% | ||
| BE - JKS | 49% Loosely correlated | -9.78% | ||
| FCEL - JKS | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SEDG - JKS | 45% Loosely correlated | -5.69% | ||
| NXT - JKS | 44% Loosely correlated | -6.14% | ||
More | ||||