CSLMF
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
ESHA
Price
$11.12
Change
+$0.13 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 30, 01:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
151.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs ESHA

Header iconCSLMF vs ESHA Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs ESHABanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$12.05
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Volume$6.31K
Capitalization105.06M
ESH Acquisition
Price$11.12
Change+$0.13 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization151.76M
CSLMF vs ESHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. ESHA commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a StrongBuy and ESHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $12.05 vs. ESHA: $10.99)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and ESHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 108% vs. ESHA: 9%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $105.06M vs. ESHA: $151.76M
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.06M. ESHA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $151.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileESHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ESHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLMF and ESHA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • ESHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ESHA is a better buy in the short-term than CSLMF.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

ESHA is expected to report earnings on Apr 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESHA($152M) has a higher market cap than CSLMF($105M). ESHA has higher P/E ratio than CSLMF: ESHA (167.28) vs CSLMF (16.93). CSLMF YTD gains are higher at: 4.783 vs. ESHA (2.043). ESHA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -391.76K vs. CSLMF (-1.14M). ESHA has more cash in the bank: 1.97M vs. CSLMF (174K). CSLMF (0) and ESHA (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFESHACSLMF / ESHA
Capitalization105M152M69%
EBITDA-1.14M-391.76K290%
Gain YTD4.7832.043234%
P/E Ratio16.93167.2810%
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K1.97M9%
Total Debt600KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFESHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ESHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NDRBF4.400.17
+3.92%
Nibe Industrier AB
OPWEF0.08N/A
+1.92%
Opawica Explorations Inc.
FPRGF0.18N/A
N/A
Falco Resources Ltd.
JNNDF0.13N/A
N/A
Japan Display, Inc.
IVCGF19.57-0.01
-0.07%
IVECO GROUP NV

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
VMCAF - CSLMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
SZZL - CSLMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CXAI - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FGMCU - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More