CSLMF
Price
$14.00
Change
+$1.00 (+7.69%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
79.04M
FGMCU
Price
$10.30
Change
+$0.07 (+0.68%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs FGMCU

Header iconCSLMF vs FGMCU Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs FGMCUBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$14.00
Change+$1.00 (+7.69%)
Volume$157
Capitalization79.04M
FG Merger II
Price$10.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.68%)
Volume$10.85K
CapitalizationN/A
CSLMF vs FGMCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. FGMCU commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Buy and FGMCU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $14.00 vs. FGMCU: $10.30)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and FGMCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 1% vs. FGMCU: 134%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $79.04M vs. FGMCU: $0
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $79.04M. FGMCU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.25M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSLMF is a better buy in the long-term than FGMCU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGMCU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the short-term than CSLMF.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGMCU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -234.06K vs. CSLMF (-2.53M). FGMCU has more cash in the bank: 518K vs. CSLMF (14K). FGMCU has less debt than CSLMF: FGMCU (286K) vs CSLMF (3.36M). CSLMF (0) and FGMCU (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFFGMCUCSLMF / FGMCU
Capitalization79MN/A-
EBITDA-2.53M-234.06K1,083%
Gain YTD21.739N/A-
P/E Ratio353.50N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14K518K3%
Total Debt3.36M286K1,176%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFFGMCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
6%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWPC0.03N/A
N/A
Blue Water Petroleum Corp.
OMRNY27.28-0.23
-0.84%
OMRON Corp.
KELTF5.15-0.08
-1.61%
Kelt Exploration Ltd.
FPOCF0.25N/A
-1.91%
FPX Nickel Corp.
FINMF61.41-1.25
-1.99%
Leonardo S.P.A.

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCAF - CSLMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SZZL - CSLMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CXAI - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
FGMCU - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMCU has been closely correlated with EVCOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FGMCU jumps, then EVCOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
+0.68%
EVCOU - FGMCU
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
IRRX - FGMCU
50%
Loosely correlated
-52.35%
CSLUF - FGMCU
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MACI - FGMCU
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXAI - FGMCU
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
More