CSLMF
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
105.06M
FUNTF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
2.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLMF vs FUNTF

Header iconCSLMF vs FUNTF Comparison
Open Charts CSLMF vs FUNTFBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$12.05
Change+$0.08 (+0.67%)
Volume$6.31K
Capitalization105.06M
FOUNTAINHALL CAP
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization2.31M
CSLMF vs FUNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLMF vs. FUNTF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLMF is a Hold and FUNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLMF: $12.05 vs. FUNTF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: CSLMF and FUNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLMF: 108% vs. FUNTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CSLMF: $105.06M vs. FUNTF: $2.31M
CSLMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $105.06M. FUNTF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $2.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUNTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSLMF is a better buy in the long-term than FUNTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CSLMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while FUNTF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLMF($105M) has a higher market cap than FUNTF($2.31M). CSLMF YTD gains are higher at: 4.783 vs. FUNTF (0.000). FUNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -85.59K vs. CSLMF (-1.14M). FUNTF has more cash in the bank: 380K vs. CSLMF (174K). CSLMF (0) and FUNTF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLMFFUNTFCSLMF / FUNTF
Capitalization105M2.31M4,543%
EBITDA-1.14M-85.59K1,327%
Gain YTD4.7830.000-
P/E Ratio16.93N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K380K46%
Total Debt600KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLMFFUNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
7%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
2%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
9%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHMUY43.65N/A
N/A
Shimizu Corp.
CMCAF11.40N/A
N/A
Capitalworks Emerging Markets Acquisition Corp
CFRUY18.88-0.22
-1.15%
Compagnie Financiere Richemont AG
ZAIRF0.04N/A
-1.23%
ABOUND ENERGY INC.
JPSWY27.00-3.32
-10.95%
The Japan Steel Works, Ltd.

CSLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLMF and HSPO have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLMF and HSPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLMF
1D Price
Change %
CSLMF100%
N/A
HSPO - CSLMF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
VMCAF - CSLMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
SZZL - CSLMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
CXAI - CSLMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FGMCU - CSLMF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

FUNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUNTF and VMCUF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUNTF and VMCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNTF
1D Price
Change %
FUNTF100%
N/A
VMCUF - FUNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSLMF - FUNTF
-13%
Poorly correlated
N/A