CSLUF
Price
$11.59
Change
+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FGMCU
Price
$10.24
Change
+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs FGMCU

Header iconCSLUF vs FGMCU Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs FGMCUBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$11.59
Change+$0.67 (+6.14%)
Volume$1.06K
CapitalizationN/A
FG Merger II
Price$10.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Volume$942
CapitalizationN/A
CSLUF vs FGMCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. FGMCU commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a StrongBuy and FGMCU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $11.59 vs. FGMCU: $10.24)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and FGMCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 102% vs. FGMCU: 10%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. FGMCU: $0
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. FGMCU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSLUF and FGMCU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSLUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGMCU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSLUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the short-term than CSLUF.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.02% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGMCU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -234.06K vs. CSLUF (-2.53M). FGMCU has more cash in the bank: 518K vs. CSLUF (14K). FGMCU has less debt than CSLUF: FGMCU (286K) vs CSLUF (3.36M). CSLUF (0) and FGMCU (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLUFFGMCUCSLUF / FGMCU
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDA-2.53M-234.06K1,083%
Gain YTD-0.855N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash14K518K3%
Total Debt3.36M286K1,176%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUFFGMCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
6%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRS39.260.67
+1.74%
TriMas Corp
WIX147.152.50
+1.73%
Wix.com Ltd
WAFDP16.920.16
+0.92%
WaFd
LRMR3.87-0.07
-1.78%
Larimar Therapeutics
RDIB12.20-0.40
-3.17%
Reading International

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
N/A
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
SZZLU - CSLUF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMAU - CSLUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
FGMCU - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
AIMTF - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMCU has been closely correlated with EVCOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FGMCU jumps, then EVCOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
+0.29%
EVCOU - FGMCU
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
IRRX - FGMCU
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - FGMCU
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MACI - FGMCU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXAI - FGMCU
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.67%
More