CSLUF
Price
$10.92
Change
-$58.31 (-84.23%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
FGMCU
Price
$10.07
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSLUF vs FGMCU

Header iconCSLUF vs FGMCU Comparison
Open Charts CSLUF vs FGMCUBanner chart's image
CSLM Acquisition
Price$10.92
Change-$58.31 (-84.23%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
FG Merger II
Price$10.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$3.4K
CapitalizationN/A
CSLUF vs FGMCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSLUF vs. FGMCU commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSLUF is a StrongBuy and FGMCU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CSLUF: $10.92 vs. FGMCU: $10.07)
Brand notoriety: CSLUF and FGMCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSLUF: 57% vs. FGMCU: 18%
Market capitalization -- CSLUF: $0 vs. FGMCU: $0
CSLUF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. FGMCU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSLUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSLUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the long-term than CSLUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGMCU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CSLUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSLUF is expected to report earnings on Apr 11, 2025.

FGMCU is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSLUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.14M vs. FGMCU (-2.41M). CSLUF has more cash in the bank: 174K vs. FGMCU (6.28K). CSLUF has less debt than FGMCU: CSLUF (600K) vs FGMCU (845K). CSLUF (0) and FGMCU (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSLUFFGMCUCSLUF / FGMCU
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDA-1.14M-2.41M47%
Gain YTD-6.587N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash174K6.28K2,770%
Total Debt600K845K71%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLUFFGMCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBIO43.991.16
+2.71%
BridgeBio Pharma
HRZN7.450.08
+1.09%
Horizon Technology Finance Corp
IRD1.000.01
+1.01%
Opus Genetics Inc
TFINP22.000.22
+1.01%
Triumph Financial
GBX56.30-0.61
-1.07%
Greenbrier Companies (The)

CSLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSLUF and NPWR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSLUF and NPWR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSLUF
1D Price
Change %
CSLUF100%
N/A
NPWR - CSLUF
32%
Poorly correlated
+24.02%
SZZLU - CSLUF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
FGMCU - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AIMTF - CSLUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PORT - CSLUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMCU has been loosely correlated with IRRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGMCU jumps, then IRRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
+0.10%
IRRX - FGMCU
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - FGMCU
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEEP - FGMCU
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
CXAI - FGMCU
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
CSTAF - FGMCU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More