Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSMDX vs FSSNX
CSMDX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs FSSNX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$15.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.7M
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03B
CSMDX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs. FSSNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29B vs. CSMDX (156M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: FSSNX (0.80) vs CSMDX (0.54). CSMDX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: CSMDX (9 years) vs FSSNX (14 years). CSMDX (1.34) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). CSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMDX: FSSNX (0) vs CSMDX (5000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.54 vs. CSMDX (-7.34). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. CSMDX (20.82).
| CSMDX | FSSNX | CSMDX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.03 | 3,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.03 | 5,360% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.587 | 6.647 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 29B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.80 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.34 | 2.54 | -289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 33.14 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.82 | 37.59 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement