Ad is loading...
CSMDX vs NAESX
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts CSMDX vs NAESX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth I
Price$15.61
Change-$0.22 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$106.43
Change-$1.66 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSMDX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSMDX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSMDX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. CSMDX (176M). NAESX pays higher dividends than CSMDX: NAESX (1.31) vs CSMDX (0.76). CSMDX was incepted earlier than NAESX: CSMDX (8 years) vs NAESX (64 years). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. CSMDX (0.02). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSMDX: NAESX (3000) vs CSMDX (5000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. CSMDX (11.65). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.80 vs. CSMDX (32.94).
| CSMDX | NAESX | CSMDX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.351 | 5.951 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176M | 149B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.31 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.65 | 14.24 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.71 | -0.41 | -171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.94 | 48.80 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.77 | - |