Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNCX
CSPAX vs GLNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.17
Change-$0.58 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.39B
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$22.16
Change-$0.13 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.33M
CSPAX vs GLNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and GLNCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNCX (72.3M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNCX (14 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: CSPAX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.49 vs. GLNCX (8.20). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.31 vs. GLNCX (13.18).
| CSPAX | GLNCX | CSPAX / GLNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.56 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.960 | 11.694 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 72.3M | 112,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.49 | 8.20 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.43 | 35.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.31 | 13.18 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.18 | 54.75 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement