Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.61
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.08B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$24.95
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.41M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. GLNIX (71.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: CSPAX (0.58) vs GLNIX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (23 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. GLNIX (12.15). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.09 vs. CSPAX (13.28).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.095 | 9.526 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.1B | 71.4M | 110,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.55 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.88 | 12.15 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.38 | 26.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.28 | 16.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.59 | 61.89 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement