Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.50
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$23.99
Change-$0.10 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNIX (68.3M). CSPAX (0.55) and GLNIX (0.55) have matching dividends . CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. GLNIX (2.13). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.74 vs. CSPAX (1.73).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.929 | 5.312 | 149% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.3B | 68.3M | 116,105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.55 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 2.13 | 299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 28.91 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.73 | 2.74 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.64 | 62.52 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement