Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.48
Change+$0.75 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.20
Change+$0.13 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.09M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GLNIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. GLNIX (71.1M). CSPAX (0.56) and GLNIX (0.54) have matching dividends . CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. GLNIX (6.05). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 10.28 vs. CSPAX (9.27).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.428 | 10.053 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3B | 71.1M | 114,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.54 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 6.05 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.34 | 48.17 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | 10.28 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.74 | 70.06 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement