Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNIX
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.25
Change-$0.53 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.76B
MFS Global New Discovery I
Price$25.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.12M
CSPAX vs GLNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNIX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNIX (72.1M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNIX: CSPAX (0.58) vs GLNIX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNIX (14 years). GLNIX (1.56) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNIX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. GLNIX (6.96). GLNIX return over 5 years is better than : 16.16 vs. CSPAX (12.81).
| CSPAX | GLNIX | CSPAX / GLNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.10 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.56 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.571 | 11.370 | 93% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 72.1M | 112,067% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.55 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.51 | 6.96 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.70 | 35.96 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.81 | 16.16 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.69 | 76.22 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement