Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNLX
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNLX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$24.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.36M
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNLX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and GLNLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNLX (72.4M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: CSPAX (0.56) vs GLNLX (0.35). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNLX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNLX (14 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNLX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. GLNLX (8.33). CSPAX (17.56) and GLNLX (17.35) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSPAX | GLNLX | CSPAX / GLNLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.81 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.673 | 11.512 | 101% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 72.4M | 112,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.35 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 8.33 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.70 | 39.30 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 17.35 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.97 | 68.91 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement