Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNLX
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNLX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.50
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$23.28
Change-$0.10 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.27M
CSPAX vs GLNLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. GLNLX (68.3M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: CSPAX (0.55) vs GLNLX (0.36). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNLX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNLX (14 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNLX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. GLNLX (1.83). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.73 vs. GLNLX (1.26).
| CSPAX | GLNLX | CSPAX / GLNLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.35 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.81 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.929 | 5.102 | 155% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.3B | 68.3M | 116,105% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.36 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 1.83 | 347% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 27.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.73 | 1.26 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.64 | 58.13 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement