Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNNX
CSPAX vs GLNNX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNNX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.33
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.75B
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$25.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
CSPAX vs GLNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNNX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GLNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. GLNNX (71.2M). GLNNX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: GLNNX (0.62) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNNX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNNX (13 years). GLNNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNNX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.77 vs. GLNNX (4.36). GLNNX return over 5 years is better than : 17.76 vs. CSPAX (16.09).
| CSPAX | GLNNX | CSPAX / GLNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.01 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.46 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.692 | 10.306 | 104% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 71.2M | 113,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.77 | 4.36 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.34 | 53.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.09 | 17.76 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.17 | 81.35 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement