Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GLNNX
CSPAX vs GLNNX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GLNNX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
MFS Global New Discovery R6
Price$25.46
Change+$0.22 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.36M
CSPAX vs GLNNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GLNNX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and GLNNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNNX (72.4M). GLNNX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: GLNNX (0.62) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GLNNX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GLNNX (13 years). GLNNX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). GLNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). GLNNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: GLNNX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.31 vs. GLNNX (8.67). GLNNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.69 vs. CSPAX (17.56).
| CSPAX | GLNNX | CSPAX / GLNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.01 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.46 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.673 | 11.747 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.4B | 72.4M | 112,431% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 8.67 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.70 | 40.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.56 | 19.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.97 | 74.85 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement