Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSCX
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.35
Change-$0.26 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.91B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.6M
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and RGSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.9B vs. RGSCX (43.6M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSCX (1.45) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSCX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. RGSCX (-8.64). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.20 vs. RGSCX (-24.80).
| CSPAX | RGSCX | CSPAX / RGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.231 | 6.384 | 192% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.9B | 43.6M | 187,844% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | -8.64 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.18 | 20.56 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.20 | -24.80 | -65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.50 | -37.73 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement