Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSCX
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.76B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.11
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.66M
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and RGSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. RGSCX (44.7M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSCX (1.46) vs CSPAX (0.58). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSCX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. RGSCX (-5.66). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.63 vs. RGSCX (-24.33).
| CSPAX | RGSCX | CSPAX / RGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.371 | 7.813 | 146% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 44.7M | 180,761% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.46 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | -5.66 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.69 | 17.66 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | -24.33 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.12 | -36.77 | -164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement