Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSCX
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.48
Change+$0.75 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.77M
CSPAX vs RGSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and RGSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. RGSCX (41.8M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSCX (1.49) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSCX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. RGSCX (-11.76). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.27 vs. RGSCX (-32.73).
| CSPAX | RGSCX | CSPAX / RGSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.38 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 2.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.428 | 2.589 | 480% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3B | 41.8M | 194,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.49 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | -11.76 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.34 | 24.12 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | -32.73 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.74 | -39.91 | -160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement