Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSLBX
CSQCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSLBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$8.91
Change-$0.05 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$61.25
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.93B
CSQCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 78.9B vs. CSQCX (20.1M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: CSQCX (0.91) vs RSLBX (0.06). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: CSQCX (24 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSLBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. CSQCX (-11.53). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : -3.53 vs. CSQCX (-20.73).
| CSQCX | RSLBX | CSQCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.75 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.75 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.240 | 7.463 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.1M | 78.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 0.06 | 1,626% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.53 | 5.21 | -221% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.34 | 26.61 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.73 | -3.53 | 586% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.13 | 40.43 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers