CSRNF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.91M
FPRGF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
33.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSRNF vs FPRGF

Header iconCSRNF vs FPRGF Comparison
Open Charts CSRNF vs FPRGFBanner chart's image
Canstar Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30K
Capitalization2.91M
Falco Resources
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization33.8M
CSRNF vs FPRGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSRNF vs. FPRGF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSRNF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CSRNF: $0.05 vs. FPRGF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: CSRNF and FPRGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSRNF: 24% vs. FPRGF: 47%
Market capitalization -- CSRNF: $2.91M vs. FPRGF: $33.8M
CSRNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.91M. FPRGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $33.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSRNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CSRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the long-term than CSRNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSRNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPRGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSRNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the short-term than CSRNF.

Price Growth

CSRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.87% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($33.8M) has a higher market cap than CSRNF($2.91M). CSRNF YTD gains are higher at: 104.000 vs. FPRGF (-3.684). FPRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.32M vs. CSRNF (-8.45M). FPRGF has more cash in the bank: 6.78M vs. CSRNF (761K). CSRNF (0) and FPRGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CSRNFFPRGFCSRNF / FPRGF
Capitalization2.91M33.8M9%
EBITDA-8.45M-2.32M364%
Gain YTD104.000-3.684-2,823%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash761K6.78M11%
Total DebtN/A32.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSRNF vs FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
CSRNF
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88100
SMR RATING
1..100
10089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPRGF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CSRNF (81). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

CSRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (100). This means that CSRNF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CSRNF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CSRNF (35). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

FPRGF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSRNF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSRNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSRNFFPRGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABL5.390.06
+1.13%
Abacus Global Management Inc
GLDG0.73N/A
+0.68%
GoldMining
ULTA477.792.95
+0.62%
Ulta Beauty
SMPL32.060.02
+0.06%
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
BLRX4.49-0.12
-2.60%
BioLineRx Ltd

CSRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSRNF and FPRGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSRNF and FPRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSRNF
1D Price
Change %
CSRNF100%
N/A
FPRGF - CSRNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRECF - CSRNF
8%
Poorly correlated
+4.02%
CMRZF - CSRNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
CMDRF - CSRNF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNIKF - CSRNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
N/A
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More