Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$52.01
Change+$0.26 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.16
Change+$0.05 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.32M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and DGBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. DGBCX (290M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (2.74) vs DGBCX (1.70). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (28 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.72 vs. CSSPX (9.31). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.88 vs. DGBCX (24.21).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.900 | 0.620 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 290M | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 1.70 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 10.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.19 | -14.91 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.88 | 24.21 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.06 | -2.10 | -1,577% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...