Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$51.29
Change-$1.00 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.03
Change-$0.18 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.25M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. DGBCX (296M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (2.74) vs DGBCX (1.70). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (28 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. CSSPX (6.17). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 52.29 vs. DGBCX (38.85).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.449 | 1.489 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 296M | 609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.74 | 1.70 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 8.61 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.77 | -16.39 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.29 | 38.85 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.20 | -1.56 | -2,188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...