Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.35
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.98B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.95M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.98B vs. DGBCX (310M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (2.87) vs DGBCX (1.65). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (28 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). DGBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.29 vs. CSSPX (2.04). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.10 vs. DGBCX (15.09).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.269 | 8.313 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.98B | 310M | 639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 1.65 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.04 | 2.29 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.97 | 6.74 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.10 | 15.09 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.71 | 17.28 | 340% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers