Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.56
Change-$0.19 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.74
Change-$0.05 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets316.6M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a StrongBuy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. DGBCX (317M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (2.77) vs DGBCX (1.58). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (28 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.31 vs. DGBCX (-0.67). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 29.33 vs. DGBCX (17.65).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.986 | 9.057 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 317M | 650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 1.58 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | -0.67 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.10 | 12.14 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.33 | 17.65 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.00 | 16.44 | 353% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement