Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs DGBCX
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs DGBCX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.38
Change+$0.22 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
Price$8.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.76M
CSSPX vs DGBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. DGBCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and DGBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. DGBCX (303M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than DGBCX: CSSPX (2.87) vs DGBCX (1.65). CSSPX was incepted earlier than DGBCX: CSSPX (28 years) vs DGBCX (17 years). DGBCX (2.42) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. DGBCX (47.81). DGBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: DGBCX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. DGBCX (5.81). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 27.89 vs. DGBCX (14.05).
| CSSPX | DGBCX | CSSPX / DGBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 2.05 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.42 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.259 | 5.583 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 303M | 662% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 1.65 | 174% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 5.81 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.82 | -0.22 | -3,035% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.89 | 14.05 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.39 | 6.91 | 657% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement