Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs FGREX
CSSPX vs FGREX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs FGREX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$53.83
Change+$0.25 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
Invesco Global Real Estate R6
Price$8.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.71M
CSSPX vs FGREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. FGREX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and FGREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.01B vs. FGREX (132M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than FGREX: CSSPX (2.83) vs FGREX (2.56). CSSPX was incepted earlier than FGREX: CSSPX (28 years) vs FGREX (13 years). FGREX (0.95) and CSSPX (0.93) have similar cost to investors . FGREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 130.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). CSSPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGREX: CSSPX (100000) vs FGREX (1000000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.19 vs. FGREX (1.55). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.17 vs. FGREX (3.36).
| CSSPX | FGREX | CSSPX / FGREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.95 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.95 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.666 | 4.139 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 132M | 1,520% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 2.56 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.19 | 1.55 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.21 | -4.43 | -275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.17 | 3.36 | 988% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.95 | -6.01 | -731% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers