Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs IRFIX
CSSPX vs IRFIX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs IRFIX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.47
Change-$0.41 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
Cohen & Steers International Realty I
Price$9.13
Change-$0.06 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.64M
CSSPX vs IRFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. IRFIX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and IRFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.99B vs. IRFIX (258M). IRFIX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: IRFIX (2.82) vs CSSPX (2.62). CSSPX was incepted earlier than IRFIX: CSSPX (28 years) vs IRFIX (20 years). IRFIX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). IRFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). CSSPX (100000) and IRFIX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSSPX (9.92) and IRFIX (9.44) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. IRFIX (3.81).
| CSSPX | IRFIX | CSSPX / IRFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.00 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.22 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.720 | 16.010 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 258M | 773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 2.82 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.92 | 9.44 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.17 | 3.40 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 3.81 | 798% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.97 | 22.27 | 206% |