Ad is loading...
CSSPX vs IRFZX
CSSPX vs IRFZX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs IRFZX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$51.75
Change-$0.55 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
Cohen & Steers International Realty Z
Price$8.01
Change-$0.07 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.14M
CSSPX vs IRFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. IRFZX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and IRFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.79B vs. IRFZX (240M). IRFZX pays higher dividends than CSSPX: IRFZX (3.14) vs CSSPX (2.67). CSSPX was incepted earlier than IRFZX: CSSPX (28 years) vs IRFZX (9 years). IRFZX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.92). IRFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.00 vs. CSSPX (52.00). IRFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: IRFZX (0) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.62 vs. IRFZX (-3.03). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 9.73 vs. IRFZX (-20.01).
| CSSPX | IRFZX | CSSPX / IRFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.00 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.11 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.469 | 2.799 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 240M | 747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 3.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.62 | -3.03 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.74 | -18.57 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.73 | -20.01 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.04 | N/A | - |