Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs NRFAX
CSSPX vs NRFAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs NRFAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$55.39
Change+$0.51 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate A
Price$12.92
Change+$0.07 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.36M
CSSPX vs NRFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. NRFAX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and NRFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. NRFAX (36.4M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than NRFAX: CSSPX (2.77) vs NRFAX (2.45). CSSPX was incepted earlier than NRFAX: CSSPX (28 years) vs NRFAX (25 years). NRFAX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). NRFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). NRFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: NRFAX (2500) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.99 vs. NRFAX (-1.73). CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 32.47 vs. NRFAX (26.58).
| CSSPX | NRFAX | CSSPX / NRFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.15 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 2.01 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.269 | 8.177 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 36.4M | 5,657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 2.45 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | -1.73 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.53 | 34.58 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.47 | 26.58 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.73 | -2.78 | -2,075% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement