Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs NRFAX
CSSPX vs NRFAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs NRFAX
Cohen & Steers Global Realty I
Price$54.49
Change+$0.25 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
Natixis AEW Global Focused Real Estate A
Price$12.65
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.57M
CSSPX vs NRFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. NRFAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Buy and NRFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 1.94B vs. NRFAX (34.6M). CSSPX pays higher dividends than NRFAX: CSSPX (2.62) vs NRFAX (2.43). CSSPX was incepted earlier than NRFAX: CSSPX (28 years) vs NRFAX (24 years). NRFAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). NRFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. CSSPX (67.00). NRFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: NRFAX (2500) vs CSSPX (100000). NRFAX (8.57) and CSSPX (8.35) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 24.04 vs. NRFAX (17.13).
| CSSPX | NRFAX | CSSPX / NRFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.17 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.58 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.270 | 4.412 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 34.6M | 5,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 2.43 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 8.57 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.01 | 3.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.04 | 17.13 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.56 | -6.07 | -767% |